Vanity (un)Fair

For reasons known only to God and a harried data analyst, issues of Vanity Fair magazine have been arriving in my physical mailbox – a real magazine!

As I flipped through images of sullen-looking young people in expensive clothes, the game “Would you rather?” came to mind. It forces you to choose between two bad options , such as eating a small can of cat food or eating two rotten tomatoes. I created a new version that I’m calling Would You Rather: Vanity Unfair Edition. Here are some sample questions.

No one is actually choosing between lipstick and homecare, but at some level, we as a society are. While the rich and famous dangle high-cost baubles from their thin elegant wrists, children go to substandard schools and go hungry. There is a “let them eat cake” tinge to all of this.

I don’t fault the people buying expensive things. I fault the system that creates high profits for the few, while paying the many wages too low to feed and house a person. I like this quote from William Sloan Coffin Jr: “To show compassion for an individual without showing concern for the structures of society that make him an object of compassion is to be sentimental rather than loving.” (emphasis added)

It's the difference between volunteering in a poor neighborhood’s school and advocating for more equity in school funding. Both are valuable but system level action will press all of us to change our attitudes and change our structures that make and keep people out of prosperity.

(And, in case you were wondering, I would definitely take the two small cans of cat food. They look delicious in the ads!)

Previous
Previous

Hotter days hit some more than others

Next
Next

Who Overuses Emergency Rooms?